As an artform comprised of physical movement, dance has traditionally privileged the extraordinary body. Dancers are often treated with a certain paradoxical awe that is an odd mixture of respect for the physical discipline of daily technique classes, fascination with what is often supposed to be a "natural" gracefulness (but is, of course, a result of intensive physical training), and plain old objectification. Although the "look" of dancers has indeed changed with the political, economic, intellectual and aesthetic revolutions of the past 150 years of Western culture, the idealized image of the beautiful, graceful or sexy dancer still informs most people’s vision of professional dancing.
Given that disability signifies the cultural antithesis of the fit, healthy body, what happens when visibly disabled people move into the role of dancer, the very same role that has been historically reserved for the glorification of an ideal body? Does the integration of disabled bodies into contemporary dance result in a disruption of ablelist preconceptions about professional dance? Or does the disabled body “transcend” its disability to become a dancer? What is at stake in these questions is not merely the physical definition of a dancer's body, but the larger (metaphysical) structure of dance as a form of representation. When dancers take their place in front of the spotlight, they are often displayed in ways that accentuate the double role of technical prowess and sexual desirability (the latter being implicit in the very fact of a body’s visual availability). In contrast, the disabled body is supposed to be covered up or hidden from view, to be compensated for or overcome (either literally or metaphorically) in an attempt to live as “normal” a life as possible. When a disabled dancer enters the stage, he or she stakes claim to a radical space, an unruly location where disparate assumptions collide.
The intersection of dance and disability is an extraordinarily rich site at which to explore the overlapping constructions of the body’s physical ability, subjectivity and cultural visibility. Excavating the social meanings of these constructions is comparable to an archeological dig into the deep psychic fears that dis/ability creates. As Ynestra King puts it in her insightful essay “The Other Body”: “Visibly disabled people (like women) in this culture are the scapegoats for resentments of the limitations of organic life.” In order to examine ablelist preconceptions in the professional dance world, one must confront both the ideological and symbolic meanings that the disabled body holds in our culture, as well as the practical conditions of disability. Once again, we are in the position of having to negotiate between the theatrical representations of dancing bodies and the actuality of their physical experiences. Watching disabled bodies dancing forces us to see with a double vision, and helps us to recognize that while a dance performance is grounded in the physical capacities of a dancer, it is not limited by them.
Read the article “The Other Body: Reflections on Difference, Disability, and Identity Politics” by Ynestra King. Ask students to write a paragraph about how they feel watching disabled dancers.